[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cvs security - ssh vs pserver?



* Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@yola.bmrb.wisc.edu> [2001.11.29 16:16:48-0600]:
> You are still missing the point. Hopefully, you've read my post by
> now, but I'll reiterate.
> 
> CVS documentation states that pserver plus write access to CVS
> repository can be subverted to execute arbitrary code on the
> server. The point of using ssh is to get rid of pserver, not
> to encrypt the actual downloads (that would be rather pointless,
> no?) Of course ssh will still do the encryption, but that's 
> just a side-effect.

i think i actually did miss this point. i know how you can exploit
this, but it's only applicable if you *do* actually have write access,
which would be pretty foolish in an anonymous setup.

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
  
sum quod eris.

Attachment: pgpL3SKhGIfA4.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: