Hi! Does anyone else get this damn delivery-error msg from polska on every post on debian-user, too?? How could we get that obviously incorrect email-address off the list?
--- Begin Message ---
- To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
- Cc: The Postmaster <postmaster@elka.pw.edu.pl>
- Subject: email delivery error
- From: The Post Office <postmaster@elka.pw.edu.pl>
- Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 17:45:04 +0100
- Message-id: <20011028164505Z137028-9230+60@elektron.elka.pw.edu.pl>
--- End Message ---
error: nosuchuser: wzabolot@elka.pw.edu.pl
Reporting-MTA: dns; elektron Arrival-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 17:44:52 +0100 Original-Recipient: rfc822;wzabolot@elektron.elka.pw.edu.pl Final-Recipient: RFC822; wzabolot@elka.pw.edu.pl Action: failed Status: 5.0.0 Diagnostic-Code: X-LOCAL; 500 (nosuchuser)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: 512Meg of Ram
- From: Jens Gecius <jens@gecius.de>
- Date: 28 Oct 2001 01:51:42 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87y9lws45t.fsf@maniac.gecius.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200110272119.f9RLJDlp031513@babylon5.techgod.net> (waynes@techgod.net's message of "Sat, 27 Oct 2001 16:19:13 -0500")
- References: <[🔎] 200110272119.f9RLJDlp031513@babylon5.techgod.net>
waynes@techgod.net writes: > I just added 512meg of ram to my Debian Woody box. I had heard that Linux does not support 512meg of ram without a kernel recompile. Is this true? No, it isn't. If you have more than approx. 868MB, then the all above isn't used without a recompile with "HIGH_MEM" set. This is at least valid with 2.4.x. -- Tschoe, http://gecius.de/gpg-key.txt - Fingerprint: Jens 1AAB 67A2 1068 77CA 6B0A 41A4 18D4 A89B 28D0 F097Attachment: pgpPQD1SpWjem.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---