What stupid mistake am I makeing? (networking)
I have a Debian potato + Progeny box siting in my office, right next to a
FreebSD box. Both are conected to the same network subnet. The FreeBSD box
can get to the timeserver, Tthe Debian one cannot. I must be doing
something really stupid here.
Here is the info of interest (I think) From the Debian machine:
Script started on Thu Oct 25 10:36:28 2001
root@debian:~# ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:C9:48:DD:1E
inet addr:170.85.109.24 Bcast:170.95.109.127 Mask:255.255.255.128
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:6440 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:203 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:1651128 (1.5 Mb) TX bytes:20119 (19.6 Kb)
Interrupt:10
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:8B:E8:79:21
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x2000
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:100 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:100 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:9118 (8.9 Kb) TX bytes:9118 (8.9 Kb)
root@debian:~# netstat -rn
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
170.85.109.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 U 40 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 170.85.109.1 0.0.0.0 UG 40 0 0 eth0
root@debian:~# traceroute time.westvaco.com
traceroute to time.westvaco.com (170.85.66.92), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 * 170.85.109.1 (170.85.109.1) 22 ms 21 ms
2 170.85.115.2 (170.85.115.2) 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms
3 170.85.58.2 (170.85.58.2) 23 ms 25 ms 6 ms
4 170.85.68.254 (170.85.68.254) 9 ms 13 ms 8 ms
5 * * *
6 * *
7 Quit
root@debian:~#
Script done on Thu Oct 25 10:37:10 2001
Here is the equivelant daat from the FreeBSD machine:
Script started on Thu Oct 25 10:43:37 2001
]0;stan@brown.westvaco.com;/home/stanstan@brown.westvaco.com:/home/stan
$ ifconfig -a
lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
ed1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 170.85.109.104 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 170.85.109.127
ether 00:80:c8:bc:2d:6f
tun0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.1 --> 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00
Opened by PID 1024
]0;stan@brown.westvaco.com;/home/stanstan@brown.westvaco.com:/home/stan
$ netstat -rn
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire
default 170.85.109.1 UGSc 2 4 ed1
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 1 4 lo0
170.85 170.85.109.1 UGSc 3 19 ed1
170.85.109/25 link#3 UC 8 0 ed1
170.85.109.1 0:e0:16:75:6:84 UHLW 4 1 ed1 1189
170.85.109.24 0:a0:c9:48:dd:1e UHLW 2 72 ed1 828
170.85.109.32 0:d0:b7:91:8b:9d UHLW 0 14 ed1 1117
170.85.109.71 0:d0:b7:5d:64:df UHLW 0 144 ed1 916
170.85.109.73 0:50:ba:a0:7e:20 UHLW 0 0 ed1 1044
170.85.109.104 0:80:c8:bc:2d:6f UHLW 0 47 lo0
170.85.109.109 0:60:97:15:e8:da UHLW 3 283 ed1 1044
170.85.109.127 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 1 29 ed1
192.168.0.1 192.168.1.1 UH 2 0 tun0
205.159.77 192.168.0.1 UGSc 1 0 tun0
]0;stan@brown.westvaco.com;/home/stanstan@brown.westvaco.com:/home/stan
$ traceroute time.westvaco.com
traceroute to time (170.85.115.30), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
1 170.85.109.1 (170.85.109.1) 7.407 ms 3.989 ms 3.717 ms
2 time (170.85.115.30) 4.628 ms 4.764 ms 4.902 ms
]0;stan@brown.westvaco.com;/home/stanstan@brown.westvaco.com:/home/stan
$
Script done on Thu Oct 25 10:43:59 2001
--
Stan Brown stanb@awod.com 843-745-3154
Charleston SC.
--
Windows 98: n.
useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit
company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
-
(c) 2000 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.
Reply to: