[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: illegal to link against python 2.x?



on Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 06:59:13PM +0200, "Jürgen A. Erhard" (jae@jerhard.org) wrote:
> >>>>> "Karsten" == Karsten M Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> 
> [Stuff about Python licenses and the legality of Python/GPL projects
> snipped]
> 
>     Karsten> IANAL, TINLA, YADA.
> 
> For anyone who doesn't know these (and for me, because I'm not sure
> about them):
> 
> IANAL (I Am Not A Lawyer... that one's even in wtf)
> 
> TINLA (`dict tinla` has TINLC... so I think this is This Is Not Legal
>          Advice).

Correct.

> YADA (Yet Another D??? A??? ?   Or just "yada" as in "yada yada yada"?)

Yet another disclaimer added.  ;-)

YMMV, TANSTAAFL, HTH, HAND.

FYA&E.

...IITYWIMIWHTKY

And:  ILTNMMAMOTC.HYCFAPMSFTJ

Peace.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>       http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?             Home of the brave
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/                   Land of the free
   Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire                     http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html

Attachment: pgplS86XOTTzF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: