[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: network number



Hmmm,

Your network number should be correct, and you're right about what the
netmask *should* be. Apparantly an installation script got horribly
confused about netblocks.

Try hand-editing your network file with the correct information.

--Rich

Stan Brown wrote:
> 
> I upgraded a Debian machien this weeknd, and now it wants a bit more
> information in the /etc/network files. It wants "network number" I'm
> confused by this.
> 
> Heres what I have IP 170.85.109.24 netmask 255.255.255.128 I put in
> 170.85.109.0 for a netwokr number, but this must be wrong based upon what
> the broadcast adress of the interface becomes. It should be 170.85.109.127,
> but instead it's 170.85.255.255
> 
> --
> Stan Brown     stanb@awod.com                                    843-745-3154
> Charleston SC.
> --
> Windows 98: n.
>         useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and
>         a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
>         originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit
>         company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition.
> -
> (c) 2000 Stan Brown.  Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited.
> 


_________________________________________________________
                         
Rich Puhek               
ETN Systems Inc.         
_________________________________________________________



Reply to: