Re: BIND9 on Debian
I too am running smp with a 2.2.19 kernel. The biggest difference is that
I'm not using the package. I built it from source. I'm specifying -n 2
on the command line as well so that it uses both CPUs and in the log it
says it's using 2 cpus. So I would probably say try building it from
source like I did and see if that helps.
vec
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Doug Fields wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm sorry; it's the 9.1.3 packaged up in Debian/Woody distribution. I've
> noticed the bug list (as suggested by Sean) mentions problems with
> threading and/or multiprocessors, but Vector's response (below) indicates
> it runs stable for him, although I am running woody kernel-source-2.2.19 on
> SMP boxes.
>
> Perhaps I will try another kernel without FreeS/WAN, but that would not be
> a very tenable position in the short term for me, and the other patches I
> can't imagine affecting it (they are the 2.2.20pre-10 3ware driver, the
> latest Adaptec 7xxx driver, and the latest eepro100 driver).
>
> Thanks for any additional thoughts,
>
> Doug
>
> At 11:24 AM 9/21/2001, Vector wrote:
> >Which version of bind9? Is it the beta? I'm running bind 9.1.3 on potato
> >and I haven't had any problems yet. It seems to be serving all the domains
> >I have on it (about 100) and it reloads for me every time with
> >notifications.
> >
> >vec
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Doug Fields" <dfields@pexicom.com>
> >To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> >Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 9:21 AM
> >Subject: BIND9 on Debian
> >
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm using BIND9 on Debian Woody with Kernel 2.2.19 with several patches
> > > (primarily freeswan).
> > >
> > > I'm finding that it doesn't work reliably in the following circumstances:
> > >
> > > 1) It doesn't seem to do a proper reload of zone files with "rndc reload"
> > > 2) After several rndc commands, the server can't be shut down (even with
> > > /etc/init.d/bind9 stop); it must be killall -9'd.
> > > 3) It doesn't send out NOTIFY messages with an "rndc reload" - but it does
> > > seem to when it starts up
> > >
> > > The reason I'm using BIND9 is to take advantage of the "views" feature to
> > > allow my internal names visible behind my firewall, and the external ones
> > > (a subset of the internal ones) visible outside the firewall.
> > >
> > > I would appreciate any suggestions.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Doug
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> >listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >--
> >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
>
Reply to: