[MAILER-DAEMON@bmrb.wisc.edu: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]
OK kids, whose mailer is b0rken? I'm sure mine doesn't set
"CC: debian", and can't I check the headers in original
message as I've already deleted it.
Figuring out what's wrong with "CC: debian" is left as an
exercise to the reader.
----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@bmrb.wisc.edu> -----
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:25:06 -0500 (CDT)
From: MAILER-DAEMON@bmrb.wisc.edu (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
...
<debian@bmrb.wisc.edu>: host bmrb.wisc.edu[144.92.167.201] said: 550
<debian@bmrb.wisc.edu>... User unknown
...
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:25:05 -0500
From: Dimitri Maziuk <dmaziuk@bmrb.wisc.edu>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian@bmrb.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: woody: segfaulting all over the place
...
* Frank Preut (debian@blinx.de) spake thusly:
...
> i didn't think of memory because i didn't change anything there in the
> last six months.. but maybe it got wrecked recently so i tested it with
> the latest version 2.7 of memtest.. and indeed it came up with an error
> at the address 04e0 during test no. 4 so i tried playing around with the
> two 64 mb modules and the exact same error occurs no matter which module
> is installed in which lot.. ?? wtf, what is wrong here? and why did it
> work before, i'm quite sure that i got an error when i tested memory
> before.. could it be the cache (32k of level 1, 512 of level 2)? and
> couldn't do anything about that, right?
Memory words may be stripped accross both modules. If so, swapping the
modules will put the error in a different part of the same word, and the
address will not change. I think.
Dima
--
E-mail dmaziuk at bmrb dot wisc dot edu (@work) or at crosswinds dot net (@home)
http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu/descript/gpgkey.dmaziuk.ascii -- GnuPG 1.0.4 public key
The wombat is a mixture of chalk and clay used for respiration. -- MegaHal
Reply to: