on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:36:25AM -0500, Dave Sherohman (esper@sherohman.org) wrote: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 12:15:52PM -0400, Scott_Patterson@AndersonsInc.com wrote: > > Are unstable (sid) security patches posted in the > > main repository (US for me) or in security? In other words, do I need to > > track the "security" site in unstable (sid)? > > No. Security patches are applied directly to the main sid archive. Disagreed. Given different procedures for updating Sid and Security sites, one or the other may be more current. I keep my Sid sources.list pointing at stable, unstable, and security. I pull the most recent package(s) from whichever source is most up to date. There is no conflict, and a (theoretical) slight advantage. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
Attachment:
pgprctH51ucit.pgp
Description: PGP signature