Re: Do I need ldso

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Do I need ldso
From: John Hasler <john@dhh.gt.org>
Date: 24 Aug 2001 15:44:43 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 874rqx6vd0.fsf@toncho.dhh.gt.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 998677709.26668.3.camel@hamlet>
References: <[🔎] 20010824181542.A7486@debian.local> <[🔎] 20010824123727.C16108@micromuse.com> <[🔎] 998677709.26668.3.camel@hamlet>

Aquila writes:
> ... the one in the (obsolete) ldso package is an old version (1.9.11?)
> and is for libc5...

The most recent version of the ldso package is also 'Priority: optional'.
The libc5 package depends on it.
-- 
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do I need ldso
  - From: Anthony Campbell <a.campbell@doctors.org.uk>

References:
- Do I need ldso
  - From: Anthony Campbell <a.campbell@doctors.org.uk>
- Re: Do I need ldso
  - From: Nathan E Norman <nnorman@micromuse.com>
- Re: Do I need ldso
  - From: Aquila <aquila@hypox.org>

Prev by Date: apt-get cannot get any files (404)
Next by Date: Re: apt-get cannot get any files (404)
Previous by thread: Re: Do I need ldso
Next by thread: Re: Do I need ldso
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread