Re: DEB vs RPM

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: DEB vs RPM
From: David Nusinow <krmt1984@ucla.edu>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 19:41:12 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 200108240238.TAA05275@panther.noc.ucla.edu>
Reply-to: krmt1984@ucla.edu
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010823223447.A3359@quillandmouse.com>
References: <[🔎] 20010824014306.46476.qmail@web14903.mail.yahoo.com> <[🔎] 20010823223447.A3359@quillandmouse.com>

On Thursday 23 August 2001 07:34 pm, Paul M Foster wrote:
> Debian (if it wants to be LSB compliant) provide a way to install the RPMs 
> from such a vendor.

As a sidenote, Debian does, via the rpm and alien packages.

- David Nusinow
   krmt1984@ucla.edu

Reply to:

References:
- DEB vs RPM
  - From: Miaoling Chiu <chiu_miaoling@yahoo.com>
- Re: DEB vs RPM
  - From: Paul M Foster <paulf@quillandmouse.com>

Prev by Date: Re: DEB vs RPM
Next by Date: Re: Replacing kerneld with kmod?
Previous by thread: Re: DEB vs RPM
Next by thread: [jason@whizzird.net: Re: Network configuration]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread