[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Slightly OT] Linux's 10th Birthday



hi ya peter...

there's several linux birthday celebrations going on...
around the world...

	http://www.Linux10.org

guess the dayz when there was just 10 people gathered around
Linus is long since gone ...was only 5 or so years ago too

have fun
alvin


On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:

> Please excuse me if this is slightly OT, but it's important stuff!!
> 
> I went to Linus' book-signing in Stockholm yesterday and finally
> got to meet our hero in person.
> 
> The event was organized as a kind of "press conference", where the
> "press" were the people waiting to buy a signed copy of the book.
> My guess, from looking at the number of "got root?" t-shirts versus
> the rest, is that of about 200 people present, less than half were
> actual Linux enthusiasts, the rest being those merely interested in
> the Linux phenomenon, and/or waiting to meet Linus.
> 
> We got the chance to ask Linus some questions, but as soon as people
> started to get technical he asked us to tone it down to a more
> general level. So I asked him the question I posed here back in
> January (with no response): "When exactly is Linux's 10th birthday?"
> 
> Linus thought for a moment, then said "Well it depends who you ask:
> My first posting to comp.os.minix, when I announced that I was
> working on Linux, was on August 25th, but the first time I made the
> souce code available for version 0.01 was September 17th. I would
> say, if you want to be really certain, you should party on both
> days."
> 
> So it sound as if Linux, like the Queen of England, has two
> birthdays. Linus apparently has no strong feelings about which
> is the "official" one, so... Party, Party!
> 
> --
> Best regards,
> 
> Peter Hugosson-Miller
> "Linux - the choice of a GNU generation!"
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 



Reply to: