[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: picture browser for debian

<quoting trimmed to stay readable>
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:30:06 EDT, Wayne Topa writes:
>Quoting Robert Waldner(waldner@waldner.priv.at):
>> On Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:39:12 +0200, Eduard Bloch writes:
>> >The mail was not intended for you only. 
>> Yes, I got that. I mentioned it even. But something along the lines of 
>>  "ignored Reply-To ´cause of"  would´ve been nice.
>  The mail he Replied To didn't have a Reply-To header, this one does
>  tho.

It did, he replied to 
200108162124.f7GLOtfe029724@WatchZwerg.waldner.priv.at, which, as 
received here via the list, had the following headers:

Return-path: <bounce-debian-user=waldner=waldner.priv.at@lists.debian.org>
Resent-date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:25:54 +0200
Message-id: <200108162124.f7GLOtfe029724@WatchZwerg.waldner.priv.at>
Reply-to: Robert Waldner <waldner@waldner.priv.at>
Sender: waldner@waldner.priv.at
Resent-message-id: <IrFnq.A.XIG.toDf7@murphy>
Resent-from: debian-user@lists.debian.org
X-mailing-list: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/164598
X-loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: picture browser for debian
From: Robert Waldner <waldner@waldner.priv.at>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:24:55 +0200

But I´d rather let that thread die now, I fear that neither I nor 
 others will get any more benefit out of it. I´m tempted to start a 
 real flame-war, but I don´t have the time for such ;-)

&r<again, reply-to set>w
-- Gordon's Law: If you think you have the
-- solution, the question was poorly phrased. 

Attachment: pgp6KVgmJwqCx.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: