On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 06:54:33PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft (madduck@madduck.net) wrote: > > also sprach Karsten M. Self (on Wed, 25 Jul 2001 12:27:54PM -0700): > > > Have you looked at bitkeeper (http://www.bitkeeper.com/)? This is an > > > almost-free software versioning system which addresses several > > > weaknesses of CVS and might suit your needs. Larry McVoy is also pretty > > > keen on distributed processing issues. > > > > bitkeeper looks like a good idea, but it's commercial and i do not > > have monetary means available. aside, i could not find some sort of > > evaluation, so i could not establish, whether bitkeeper would solve my > > problems. > > BitKeeper has a mixed model. It's commercial if you use it for > proprietary tasks (and don't want logging). It's free (beer) if you use > it for free software and/or allow its logging. Either way, source is > available. <rant> I don't understand why semi-commercial software with weird licensing can be mentioned on debian lists without provoking vitriol from purists, but mention of any software written by djb does? </rant> No flame intended Karsten ... just had to get that off my chest :) Cheers, -- Nathan Norman - Staff Engineer | A good plan today is better Micromuse Ltd. | than a perfect plan tomorrow. mailto:nnorman@micromuse.com | -- Patton
Attachment:
pgpdUXpJalhan.pgp
Description: PGP signature