Re: balsa: orphaned?

[Erik Steffl <steffl@bigfoot.com>]

hzi wrote:
> 
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mensagem anterior <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> 
> No dia 26/07/01, 06:00:10, Erik Steffl <steffl@bigfoot.com> escreveu o
> seguinte sobre o tema balsa: orphaned?:
> 
> >   what's up with balsa? there's a huge number of old bugs (year or two
> > old) including the ne that makes it uninstallable (+2 month days):
> 
> > Grave functionality bugs - outstanding
> 
> > (A list of all such bugs used to be available).
> 
> >      #98110: balsa: depends on libltdl0, which has been removed
> >      Package: balsa; Severity: grave; Reported by: Colin Watson
> > <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>; 66 days old.
> 
> >   anybody knows what's going on?
> 
> >
> Hey, Balsa is great, in that it uses Unix mbox, and you can use procmail
> with it.
> It shouldn't be orphaned, if it's tue, what a shame!

  I mean the debian package seems to be not taken care of, not balsa
itself. there are quite a few bug (lot of them 1+ year old), it's not
even installable (in unstable) - that's an 2+ months old bug (depends on
non-existing library):

  balsa: Depends: libltdl0 but it is not installable

	erik