[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PINE



On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Ari Pollak wrote:

>On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 07:23:58PM -0700, idalton@ferret.dyndns.org wrote:
>> I haven't used pine in ages. Switched to mutt not long ago, and haven't
>> looked back.. But, there was a 'mana' package, which appears to be a
>> fork from pine. Worked about as well when I tried it, but I haven't heard
>> a thing about it since.
>> http://kt.zork.net/debian/dd20000914_2_print.html#3
>>
>
>Wouldn't it be illegal to fork pine?

They forked pine 3.something--the last pine under the GPL before UW wrote
their own license.  It was standard on yggdrasil Linux :)

>

-- 
The early worm gets the bird.

Who is John Galt?  galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!



Reply to: