Re: hard drives
On Monday 16 July 2001 12:52, Martin F. Krafft wrote:
> also sprach allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx (on Mon, 16 Jul 2001
> > in addition, if i were not seeing hdc already, i would not be as
> > mystified. on the other hand, given that hdc is there, i would have
> > expected hdd to be as well. am i missing something here???
> hdc presence doesn't mean anything if you are looking for hdd. sure,
> it's got to be present for hdd to be, but it doesn't mean that hdd is
> you should really try the 2.4.x series, just to see if that fixes your
if only that were an option for me. the decision (not mine) is that we will
develop on 2.2.12. but that is a local political issue.....
the interesting this is this:
initially, i had the setup as
with all jumpers (master/slave) appropriatly set.
and as previously noted, redhat 7.1 (2.4.2) saw the configuration,
debian (2.2.12) did not.
do to double check jumpers, and just out of curiosity, i switched hdc and hdd.
now both linux's see all four drives. (which still begs the question why
debian did not before.... but that is just a side issue now. it works.
thanks to martin for his kind help.
allen wayne best
contractor, diagnostics and support tools
"your friendly neighborhood rambler owner"
"my rambler will go from 0 to 105"
Current date: 3:34:13::196:2001