Re: harsher kill than kill -9 ?
but by far, the most efficient method is still rebooting
k h a o s * lamer
new name, new look, new ftp:
linuxxxxx.dyn.dhs.org (change FOUR letter)
upload something before downloading, or your class C IP banned.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joost Kooij" <email@example.com>
To: "Daniel Patrick Berdine" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: harsher kill than kill -9 ?
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 11:06:57AM -0400, Daniel Patrick Berdine wrote:
> > Is there any way to kill a process that kill -9 <pid> won't remove
> > rebooting?
> Unblock the process in the kernel, so its pending signals can be handled.
> This is admittedly rather difficult to force from the user side of the
> kernel barrier.
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact