Re: harsher kill than kill -9 ?
but by far, the most efficient method is still rebooting
--
k h a o s * lamer
new name, new look, new ftp:
linuxxxxx.dyn.dhs.org (change FOUR letter)
upload something before downloading, or your class C IP banned.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joost Kooij" <joost@topaz.mdcc.cx>
To: "Daniel Patrick Berdine" <db002i@mail.rochester.edu>
Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: harsher kill than kill -9 ?
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 11:06:57AM -0400, Daniel Patrick Berdine wrote:
> > Is there any way to kill a process that kill -9 <pid> won't remove
without
> > rebooting?
>
> Unblock the process in the kernel, so its pending signals can be handled.
> This is admittedly rather difficult to force from the user side of the
> kernel barrier.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Joost
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
Reply to: