[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: (OT) Perl books



Hi, i'm new to this list and i'm a newbie... anyway, i would suggest
the o'reilly perl cd bookshelf for this. (n.b. there is a mirror of it
somehere
on the internet, if you would like to have a look on that, email me
privately.
(that is obviously illegal, of course.)

--
Calvin "Lamer"
Uncertified Linux Player
Email: evil@debian.org.hk
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Jennings" <nick@namodn.com>
To: "Jay Latham" <deltamud@telocity.com>
Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 12:49 PM
Subject: Re: (OT) Perl books


>   I highly recommend, for a first perl book, Sams Teach yourself
>   Perl in 21 Days. Despite it's false title, it's a very well
>   written book, the author Laura Lemay, is a very good technical
>   writer.
>
>   Once you've tackled that book. I do recommend picking up
>   Programming Perl (3rd Edition). It's the perfect reference
>   book and I often go to it.
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 12:22:12PM -0500, Jay Latham wrote:
> > I hope I don't get flamed for asking this on this
> > list but here goes.
> > I've decided that it's time I learned a little about
> > programming and I've decided that, for various reasons,
> > Perl would be a good place to start. But I'm confused on
> > which book would be best for a total newbie. I've been
> > leaning towards the oreilly books Learning Perl 3rd edition,
> > and/or Programming Perl but thought I'd ask for opinons
> > before making the purchase. Any suggestions?
> > --
> >
> > Jay Latham
> >
> > Beer is proof God loves us and
> > wants us to be happy!
> >
> >     Benjamin Franklin
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
>
> --
>   Nick Jennings
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>



Reply to: