On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:17:14 +0200, MaD dUCK writes: >also sprach Bob Nielsen (on Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:42:23AM -0700): >> True, but you can/should configure and compile separately for each >> destination architecture, optimizing appropriately. > >so yes, the argument that my athlon (thunderbird actually) will >outperform the others still holds. but i'd need to keep separate >source trees if i didn't want to make clean every single time - which >i usually don't since i experiment a whole lot and therefore change >the kernel - which doesn't take long thanks to make unless i make >cleaned it... you don´t need to maintain seperate trees of the whole source. just `make (menu|x|)config`, then backup the .config-file. that´s where the information you entered/chose is kept. cheers, &rw -- -- Too much is just enough. -- Mark Twain (on whiskey) ----
Attachment:
pgpHkgzH1ajCJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature