[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[jordi@sindominio.net: Re: none in Gnome menu?]



Hello,

I'm the maintainer for the nano package. Some time ago I added a
.desktop file in nano, but now I wonder if it's correct to have it
there, so I'm looking for user opinions.
Nano isn't GUI-based or anything, it's a curses editor. Do you people
think it should show up in GNOME's Applications section or should I
remove the .desktop file entirely?

Thanks,
Jordi

[please cc me as I don't follow this list]

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez || jordi@pusa.informat.uv.es || Rediscovering Freedom,
   aka Oskuro in    || jordi@sindominio.net      || Using Debian GNU/Linux
 Reinos de Leyenda  || jordi@debian.org          || http://debian.org

http://sindominio.net  GnuPG public information:      pub  1024D/917A225E 
telnet pusa.uv.es 23   73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC  2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 12:11:26PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> just for interest: is a gnome meny really the right place for the
> "nano" entry? All other editors there have an Gtk-GUI, all but "nano"
> which does not even run gnome-terminal for that. There is IIRC no policy
> about that, but I think the location is a bit weird.

Hello Edward,
I'm not a GNOME user myself, and hadn't noticed this. I wrote
nano.desktop as I thought it was cool. As there's the Debian menus
still, I guess I should remove them. Or we could ask debian-user. What
do you think?

I personally don't care as I don't use the panel.

Thanks for pointing this out.

-- 
Jordi Mallach Pérez || jordi@pusa.informat.uv.es || Rediscovering Freedom,
   aka Oskuro in    || jordi@sindominio.net      || Using Debian GNU/Linux
 Reinos de Leyenda  || jordi@debian.org          || http://debian.org

http://sindominio.net  GnuPG public information:      pub  1024D/917A225E 
telnet pusa.uv.es 23   73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC  2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E

Attachment: pgpbv7o2q7KC8.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---

Attachment: pgpSuakStFSvC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: