[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Unkillable process



Is it just me or does it all sound like we are getting involved in some mass
slaughter of children and parents

:)

Tomaas Ortega
"Hey, does anybody else hear that giant sucking sound? That's my will to
live...."
www.dematerialised.com - coming soon
www.dematerialised.com/zeitgeist/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr [Dingo] Dvorak" <dingo@texoma.net>
To: "Debian-User" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 11:54 PM
Subject: Re: Unkillable process


> On Wed, 23 May 2001, Michael Soulier wrote:
>
> MS> > netscape is known doing this, 'kill -9 <PID>' should get rid of
them,
> MS> > signal 9 is not maskable.
> MS>
> MS>     But if the process is blocked on an uninterruptable system call,
it will
> MS> never return to receive the signal. This is a known Unix deadlock that
happens
> MS> rarely. Disk reads and writes are uninterruptable, I believe. Perhaps
this
> MS> person is experiencing I/O troubles.
>
> Well, if the nutscrape was hung on uninterruptable system call, the whole
> machine would be probably deadlocked, if the child doesn't want to die,
kill
> the parent :), it will take the child down with it.
>
>                                                 Dingo.
>
>
>                                       ).|.(
>                                     '.`___'.`
>                                    ' `(>~<)' `
>      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-ooO-=(_)=-Ooo-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>       Petr [Dingo] Dvorak                             dingo@pdragon.org
>       Coder - Purple Dragon MUD                   pdragon.org port 3333
>      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-[ 369D93 ]=-
>                          Oxymoron: Microsoft Works
>      -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>



Reply to: