[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Karsten's browser reviews (updated)



on Tue, May 15, 2001 at 02:20:19PM +0800, ha shao (hashao@chinese.com) wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 08:34:22PM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > 
> > I might add that I'm quite pleased with Galeon.
> > 
> 
> I am not. Try use it with 64MB of RAM

Doing same.  

Galeon's running with about 17 tabs open.  I'm starting to cut into
swap.   OK, when system "find"s start running from cron, things start to
bog down a bit.

Just out of curiosity, why do you only have 64 M on the box?  Memory's
cheap, and even old-style DIMMS aren't too bad if you're looking to go
to 96-128MB worth.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 02:44:48 up 14 min,  5 users,  load average: 2.08, 1.53, 0.87
102 processes: 100 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states:   1.4% user,   6.7% system,   0.2% nice,  91.7% idle
Mem:     63228K total,    61784K used,     1444K free,     2540K buffers
Swap:   497972K total,    91888K used,   406084K free,    20388K cached

  PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
  661 karsten    4   0 46384  23M 12188 S     0.9 38.8   0:34 galeon-bin
  671 karsten    0   0 46384  23M 12188 S     0.0 38.8   0:00 galeon-bin
  672 karsten    1   0 46384  23M 12188 S     0.3 38.8   0:00 galeon-bin
  673 karsten    0   0 46384  23M 12188 S     0.0 38.8   0:00 galeon-bin
 1325 karsten    0   0 46384  23M 12188 S     0.0 38.8   0:00 galeon-bin
  412 root      -7 -10 41924 7208  2020 S <   0.1 11.4   0:19 XFree86
  423 root       0   0  3900 3900  3776 S     0.0  6.1   0:00 ntpd
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cheers.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>    http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?       There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/         http://www.kuro5hin.org

Attachment: pgptQhGgUsvnQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: