Re: Auto alias on reply in mutt?
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:46:19AM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > Manual:
> > push string
> > This command adds the named string to the keyboard
> > buffer.
> >
> > This leads me to believe that :command wouldn't require push... but what you
> > said is true.
>
> In mutt-speak (woof?), <create-alias> is a "function" (something
> normally executed by a keystroke), not a "command" (like stuff in
> muttrc). push is a "command" that executes a "function".
>
> So the valid syntax is:
> :<command>
> :push <function>
>
> but not
> :<function>
>
> If you look in the manual, you'll see in section 6 there are separate
> sections for commands and functions.
>
> Does that make any sense?
>
Yes, maybe I should just read through the manual from start to finish? ;)
>From reading the man page only, it is a bit confusing, but that's not new.
Mike
Reply to: