[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

nvidia X performance/problem solved...



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

 
I've been getting quite some reactions on my nvidia problem, of which about 
50% basic remarks and the other half very useful ones. Thanks for all of 
them, ...
 
I'll start with (shortly) explaining with what I was strugling and then what 
made me solve it (for more elaborate ramblings of mine about this, I suggest 
you check the mailing list archives ;) )
 
PROBLEM: whenever I started my X server with the nvidia module, I got a green 
rectangle on my screen, on the position I last played an DivX encoded film 
(either in wintendo or in Linux). It covered everything, and got rid of it by 
starting another clip.
Since then, this problem has been confirmed by a collegue of mine (Tom), on a 
Mandrake or Redhat system. Only his rectangle was reported to be orange :P
 
Tnx to Jeff Ewing and Adam Cassar that gave suggestions to solve the probs (I 
even met a person on the #nvidia channel that went there because of my mail) 
(and those I forget, because my inbox is a real mess).

Well basically, I removed the following options from the default XF86Config-4
(After recompiling a kernel without fb support (vesa or nvidia), and without 
AGP support -2.4.4-)...
 
Section "Module"
...
#       Load    "GLcore"
...
#       Load    "dri"
...
EndSection
 
and added
 
Section "Screen"
...
        Option "NvAgp" "1"
...
EndSection
 
with my device being:
Section "Device"
        Identifier      "Diamond Viper 770"
        Driver          "nvidia"
        VideoRam        32768
EndSection


- -- 
- --
       greetz, marc
 
Punishment becomes ineffective after a certain point.  Men become insensitive.
		-- Eneg, "Patterns of Force", stardate 2534.7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6+TIQBrrtk+Uxu9YRAijSAJ4uicQluuDcZ0eOyw+aRMeam5gxLQCfeg1Z
Xu4LoMFyAHBYdlJBfHY6vi4=
=EgD2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: