[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ip masquerade : which one?



iptable is kernel 2.4 specific tool.

ipchain is 2.2 specific tool but I hear it works with 2.4 kernel since
kernel 2.4 has compatibility mode or something.

So, iptables and ipchains are similar tool and you need to decide which 
one to use.

ipmasq is a convienience package which automatically configures kernel
using either ipchains or iptables.

ipmasq in potato works only with ipchains.

ipmasq in pool (woody/sid,testing/unstable) has code for iptables.

Hope things are clear.

Osamu

On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 07:50:14PM -0400, Chun Kit Edwin Lau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> 	Actually, you can use ipmasq and ipchain in 2.4 kernel if you
> compile the corresponding module. On the other hand you can use iptable for
> 2.4 kernel. (it is the recommended way since it is native to 2.4 kernel.
> 
> Edwin Lau
> 
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:35:26 D-Man wrote:
> > 
> > I see there are 2 HOWTOS for IP Masquerading and (correspondingly) 2
> > packages.  Should I be looking at "ipmasq" or "ipchains"?  How much
> > breakage (aka relearning) would I need to do if I went with a 2.4
> > kernel and iptables instead?  (I don't know the masq stuff yet so that
> > would only be 'learning', not 'relearning',  but how much other stuff
> > is radically different?)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > -D
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > listmaster@lists.debian.org
> > 
> > 
> 
> Edwin Lau (lauedw@waves.utoronto.ca)
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 

-- 
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ 
+  Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com>, GnuPG-key: 1024D/D5DE453D  +
+   For more debian survival information, peek into:                  +
+                     http://www.aokiconsulting.com/debian-survival/  +



Reply to: