Re: bind worm
* Bill White (bill.white@griggsinst.org) [010323 17:45]:
> >
> > Note that
> > Package: bind
> > Version: 1:8.2.3-4
> >
>
> This is very confusing to me. It looks to me as if the version of bind
> in stable is 8.2.2p7-1. It looks to me as if you have to go to unstable
> to get 8.2.3-4. So, when you say we should "run our updates", does that
> means we should update a production environment to unstable? Seems risky
> to me.
I do run "unstable", but "apt-cache show bind" reports this (irrelevant
parts snipped):
Package: bind
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Version: 1:8.2.3-4
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.1-2), netbase
Filename: pool/main/b/bind/bind_8.2.3-4_i386.deb
Package: bind
Version: 1:8.2.3-0.potato.1
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.1.2), netbase
Filename:
dists/potato/updates/main/binary-i386/bind_8.2.3-0.potato.1_i386.deb
Regards
Hall
Reply to:
- References:
- bind worm
- From: "John Cuson" <jcuson@labs.isdh.state.in.us>
- Re: bind worm
- From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: bind worm
- From: Bill White <bill.white@griggsinst.org>