Re: visudo not vi?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: visudo not vi?
From: Ethan Benson <erbenson@alaska.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 05:23:50 -0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010313052350.D29721@plato.local.lan>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010313151234.B11912@fantomas.sk>; from uhlar@fantomas.sk on Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 03:12:34PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 20010312235912.A212@rg2k.penguinpowered.com> <[🔎] 20010312223013.A5914@ix.netcom.com> <[🔎] 20010313151234.B11912@fantomas.sk>

On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 03:12:34PM +0100, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> 
> agreed, wtf it's still in the base distribution?
> it should be probably replaced by elvis-tiny , even on distribution disks...

it has.  check debian-boot archives.  

> comments?

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

Attachment: pgpZ4HnMAD8KF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- visudo not vi?
  - From: Jack <ifup@yifan.net>
- Re: visudo not vi?
  - From: kmself@ix.netcom.com
- Re: visudo not vi?
  - From: "Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar" <uhlar@fantomas.sk>

Prev by Date: Re: visudo not vi?
Next by Date: Re: visudo not vi?
Previous by thread: Re: visudo not vi?
Next by thread: Re: visudo not vi?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread