[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Booting from SCSI when there is IDE



Hi Russell!

I have three VIA KT-based Duron servers.
One of them has an Adaptec 29160 card wirh an external IDE-to-SCSI (that
means the three 40 GB drives are IDE, but it behaves as if it were a 80
GB (Raid 5) SCSI harddisk) RAID attached to it and two internal IDE
drives (each 20 GB).

When we first installed Debian  (2.2r0), we did this into a /boot and a
/ partition on the SCSI drive, while the two internal drives were
attached (each as master on ide 0 and 1).

First, it wouldn´t boot, but the lilo.conf manualpage and an old SUSE
handbook told us, that we had to remap the drives.

Here is what we entered into lilo.conf:

disk = /dev/sda
  bios = 0x80
disk = /dev/hda
  bios = 0x81
disk = /dev/hdc
  bios = 0x82

Boot device (boot = ) was /dev/sda1.

Worked like a breeze, but we now boot from software raid 1 devices on
the two ide disks (boot=/dev/md1, root = /dev/md2). Even this works with
lilo, but only for raid 1.

Russell Coker schrieb:
> 
> More than 3 years ago someone filed a bug report that LILO doesn't support
> booting from SCSI drives when there is an IDE drive in the system.
> 
> I am not able to test this as I don't own any SCSI devices, and the person
> who originally reported the bug hasn't responded to the last email about the
> issue.
> 
> Does anyone here have SCSI and IDE drives?  If so can you make it boot from
> SCSI?
> 
> --
> http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/     Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
> http://www.coker.com.au/postal/       Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
> http://www.coker.com.au/projects.html Projects I am working on
> http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/     My home page
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

-- 

--
Norman Schmidt             Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg
cand.chem.                 Sysadmin Wohnheimnetzwerk RatNET
mailto:schmidt@naa.net



Reply to: