[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE2 install



As I understand it, security.debian.org is still useful if you're
running testing, since someone running testing still has some packages
from potato.  Unstable gets security fixes simply from regular upgrades
while those using testing would normally have to wait for the packages
to stabalize before getting the fixes.  The security apt doesn't cover
you for all packages, but it doesn't hurt to get backported security
fixes for those packages that are still left over from stable.
I still notice that it updates are grabbed from it relatively often for
my testing box (the recent OpenSSH fix was one notable one).

-Rob

On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 10:25:43AM +1100, hogan wrote:
> > ftp://security.debian.org/debian testing main non-free contrib
> 
> I thought security only had stable? Took a peek... Seems it does have more..
> HOWEVER..
> 
> There is no ftp://security.debian.org/debian
> There is ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security potato|sid|slink|stable
> There is http://security.debian.org/dists
> There is no "testing" or "unstable" symlinks only a stable symlink
> 
> ... therefore the following work:
> 
> deb http://security.debian.org potato|sid|slink|stable main contrib non-free
> deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security potato|sid|slink|stable main
> contrib nonfree
> 
> Based upon:
> 
> ftp://security.debian.org/ has:
> d--x--x--x   2 root     root         4096 Jul 30  1999 bin
> drwxrwxr-x   6 ftp      802          4096 Feb 25 19:53 debian-non-US
> drwxrwsr-x   3 904      1129         4096 Aug 16  2000 debian-security
> d--x--x--x   2 root     root         4096 Apr 14  1999 etc
> d--x--x--x   2 root     root         4096 May 28  1999 lib
> dr-xr-xr-x   2 root     root         4096 Apr 14  1999 pub
> 
> http://security.debian.org/dists/ has:
>  potato/                 14-Oct-2000 09:39      -
>  sid/                    19-Aug-1999 21:46      -
>  slink/                  04-Sep-2000 21:04      -
>  stable/                 14-Oct-2000 09:39      -
> 
> 




Reply to: