RE: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor
Sorry for the ignorance but how does this template system work ?
I can't imagine the benefits from this kind of approach.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Taylor [mailto:exile@21stcentury.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 11:15 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: WYSIWYG HTML Editor
> From: "Keith G. Murphy" <keithmur@mindspring.com>
>Steve wrote:
>> It's like the argument that b4 good page layout apps like Quark were as
>> good as they are that the pros used to write their own postcript. Now
most
>> pros use a professional page layout app like Quark because it truly is
>> WYSIWYG and almost no one writes their own postscript anymore. =)
>>
>> Why? Because it's faster and makes fewer mistakes, in business time is
>> money.
>>
>> That's why most pros now do use a quality html layout app like
DreamWeaver
>> UltraDev, because it does the whole enchilada and is really very good.
>>
>It's certain that purely hand-editing a large site wastes a lot of
>time. But the thing left out of this discussion is templating systems
It's not "certai" at all.
>like Template Toolkit. They can get rid of all your redundant hand
>editing.
Like copy and paste.
>And HTML generation is easy to automate with one of those, where I'm
>sure postscript wouldn't be, so the above analogy doesn't really extend
>to those.
>
>Not saying UltraDev isn't good. I rather liked the standard
>DreamWeaver, but I have no interest in a WYSIWYG tool now.
http://freshmeat.net/browse/751/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: