> From: "Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps.net> >On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: >> Would that be the Latext system? Considered professionally acceptable? > >LaTeX is nice, but it is *not* a desktop publishing programming like >Quark. There's Adobe's port of Framemaker or the Corel stuff... WordPerfect and so forth.