Re: Win4Lin 2.0

To: Matthew Sackman <matthew@sackman.co.uk>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Win4Lin 2.0
From: matthew@sackman.co.uk (Matthew Sackman)
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:50:57 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010210185057.B1626@namkas.namkasnet.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20010210181001.A1626@namkas.namkasnet.com>; from matthew@sackman.co.uk on Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 06:10:01PM +0000
References: <[🔎] 20010210181001.A1626@namkas.namkasnet.com>

Sorry - just found the last thread on this - ignore this thread please.

Sorry,

Matthew


On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 06:10:01PM +0000, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> Hay!
> 
> Has anyone had any experience installing win4lin 2.0 on a debian box?
> 
> Does it work? Is it any good etc? Anything particular to look out for?
> How well do applications that are not those listed on the win4lin site
> work under win4lin?
> 
> Any info most gratefully received.
> 
> Matthew
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
>

Reply to:

References:
- Win4Lin 2.0
  - From: matthew@sackman.co.uk (Matthew Sackman)

Prev by Date: Re: True Type fonts
Next by Date: cyrus und mail-sorting
Previous by thread: Win4Lin 2.0
Next by thread: Re: sources.list
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread