Re: Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO !

To: Joris Lambrecht <jlambrec@landis.be>
Cc: "'debian-user@lists.debian.org'" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO !
From: Remco van de Meent <remco@vandemeent.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 12:03:01 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010118120301.A22559@oloon.student.utwente.nl>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 471B774D9F9BD411B93E00508BB087A618FB13@BE020-EX11>; from jlambrec@landis.be on Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:47:55AM +0100
References: <[🔎] 471B774D9F9BD411B93E00508BB087A618FB13@BE020-EX11>

Joris Lambrecht wrote:
>  
>  http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16168.html

Describing holes in lprng, wu.ftpd, and rpc.statd.

None of these holes are present in potato with the updates from
security.debian.org.


cheers,
Remco.

Reply to:

References:
- Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO !
  - From: Joris Lambrecht <jlambrec@landis.be>

Prev by Date: can't ssh into box anymore
Next by Date: SSH
Previous by thread: Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO !
Next by thread: Re: Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO !
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread