[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO !



WELL, i'm might have been somewhat too eager to spark a discussion ... the
thing i'm wondering/confused about is that the 'worm' infects only redhat
systems, according to this article at least ... strange eh ?

i only now had the time to read the securityfocus report, and yes indeed all
linux's with these versions are vulnerable.

anyway, good to know i turned of my machine this morning :)

J.L.

-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Brutsche [mailto:pbrutsch@tux.creighton.edu]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Joris Lambrecht
Cc: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org'
Subject: Re: Debian is safer than this ? I REALLY HOPE SO !


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...

>  <<The Register.url>>
>
>  http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16168.html

Anything that runs the vulnerable versions of those programs is
vulnerable, including Debian.  The key is to keep up to date with security
"patches" so that you aren't running the vunlerable versions of those
programs.

Problems like this will only affect those systems that aren't being
maintains (through lack of time, administrator cluelessness, or whatever).

- -- 
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Phil Brutsche				    pbrutsch@tux.creighton.edu

GPG fingerprint: 9BF9 D84C 37D0 4FA7 1F2D  7E5E FD94 D264 50DE 1CFC
GPG key id: 50DE1CFC
GPG public key: http://tux.creighton.edu/~pbrutsch/gpg-public-key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6ZwTf/ZTSZFDeHPwRAmgzAJ0RaaOELp++bBJ7kFGDYmkfUiR2VwCgzwD/
CnMTj0iEikSTcg9vjS24CcM=
=xr0n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: