RE: testing and proposed updates
On 12-Jan-2001 Jim McCloskey wrote:
>
>|> So will testing always be available? I like the idea. I'm just not
>|> used to packages being rolled back in a release. But if I have
>|> apt-get always looking at testing, maybe that's what will make me
>|> happy.
>
> Does the existence of `testing' mean that `proposed-updates' is (in
> effect anyway) redundant? It seems that very few packages have gone in
> there since testing came on the scene.
>
no, proposed-updates are for updates to a release. So if we want to get a
package into the next revision of Potato, it will go into proposed-updates.
Obviously this happens less often than changes to unstable.
Reply to: