Testing & new libc6 (was: Re: How stable is "testing"?)
On Jan 10 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 10-Jan-2001 Rogerio Brito wrote:
> > So, I'd like to ask you: how stable is "testing" compared to
> > potato?
>
> decently so yes.
Well, testing has just got a new user right now. And it's
great to have glibc 2.2, so that I can use large files in my
box and high UIDs (after I switch to Linux 2.4.0, of course).
:-)
BTW, I've noticed that the new glibc has optimized versions
for i586 and i686 platforms. Is there any perceptible
performance increase in using these packages or do they have
mostly psychological effect? :-)
Anyway, I'm really happy for using testing now and I'm not
scared anymore. :-) In fact, I'm highly anticipating the new
X4 and KDE debuts in testing. :-)
[]s, Roger...
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Rogerio Brito - rbrito@iname.com - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Reply to: