Re: How stable is "testing"?
Rogerio Brito wrote:
>
> Dear community,
>
> I've noticed that there are some programs in testing that I'd
> like to use (and at least one that I have to use), but I'm
> very scared of it not working correctly or breaking badly
> when, say, I'd need to get something done fast.
>
> So, I'd like to ask you: how stable is "testing" compared to
> potato?
>
> Thank you very much for your comments, Roger...
I love the new testing distribution. I've been running Woody for about
a year, and the fact that there's a testing distribution made that a
much easier choice for me. All pieces that enter testing must first
prove that they have no hideous bugs in unstable, then are committed. I
like it.
--
-=|JP|=- "Why, oh, why didn't I take the blue pill?"
Jon Pennington | Atipa Linux Solutions -o)
jpennington@atipa.com | http://www.atipa.com /\\
Kansas City, MO, USA | 816-595-3000 x1550 _\_V
6D04 39E0 CAE9 9ADA 2CA3 2EBE 898A 6C37 CA1E A29C
Reply to: