/usr/man vs /usr/share/man

To: Debian-User List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: /usr/man vs /usr/share/man
From: Henry House <hajhouse@houseag.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:55:14 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20010108155514.A3847@houseag.com>

Does anyone know why both /usr/man and /usr/share/man both exist in Debian
systems (woody and potato) and contain different files?

-- 
Henry House
OpenPGP key available from http://hajhouse.org/hajhouse.asc

Attachment: pgp6vtvNxu2oL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: /usr/man vs /usr/share/man
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: /usr/man vs /usr/share/man
  - From: Carel Fellinger <cfelling@iae.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: gnome run command
Next by Date: mutt mailbox default
Previous by thread: Re: mail client
Next by thread: Re: /usr/man vs /usr/share/man
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread