Re: ATA-100 disk under 2.2.18 -- horrible performance
Arcady Genkin wrote:
> | PIIX4: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev f9
> | PIIX4: chipset revision 1
> | ...
> | hdc: IBM-DTLA-307030, 29314MB w/1916kB Cache, CHS=59560/16/63, UDMA(100)
cool! glad it works :)
> The only question is whether I used the right patch. There seem to be
> two different kinds of patches (judging from the filename format), but
> no documentation about the difference between them. Any idea what the
> difference would be between:
> ide.126.96.36.1991.patch.gz and ide.2.2.18-27.all.20001208.patch.gz
> besides that the first one is newer?
> I used the first patch.
i'm not sure, i would of used the first one too i think. check the
filesize differences ? but if it patched cleanly and seems to be
working i'd say your set to go ..