Re: kernel 2.4.0, make-kpkg
now that ive learned that !#@$#! kernel-package
i do
make menuconfig ; make-kpkg clean ; make-kpkg
--revision=10.0+<patch1>+<patch2> binary
e.g
make-kpkg --revision=10.0+ow1+ide+lm_sensors+ipsec
sometimes i do revision of 20 or higher to try to be sure apt-get wont
try to upgrade it ...............
nate
Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
>
> So, the steps then would be the same? I mean,
> 1. make menuconfig
> 2. make-kpkg clean
> 3. make-kpkg kernel_image?
>
> Or is it necesary to do make-kpkg kernel_source,
> with subsequent dpkg -i kernel_source.deb? looping then back to
> number 1. above?
>
> Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:23:06PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Kernel 2.4.0 was declared stable yesterday I believe, a couple of
> > > questions:
> > > 1. How long it usually takes before we have a kernel-source?
> > > 2. Can we use make-kpkg (kernel package) with the linux-2.4.0.tar.gz
> > > (after unpacking, of course)? If so, what would the procedure be?
> >
> > yes kernel-package works fine with 2.4.0. you use it the same way as
> > 2.2.
> >
> > the only (minor) problem is when you remove a make-kpkg kernel image
> > /lib/modules/`uname -r` is not totally removed since the generated
> > .deb does not know about some of the extra .dep files created there.
> > this is with potato's make-kpkg, this might be fixed in later
> > versions.
> >
> > --
> > Ethan Benson
> > http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
:::
ICQ: 75132336
http://www.aphroland.org/
http://www.linuxpowered.net/
aphro@aphroland.org
Reply to: