[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

HELP: postix does not relay local senders.....



Hello,

for some strange reason qmail stopped accepting messages from outer
world, and i found no way to get it work again....

so i switched to postfix..... now most users are on the machine, but i
have some windows users that use the machine as a relay....

Now each time they send a mail i get the following:
Dec 12 11:42:09 erm1 postfix/smtpd[706]: connect from macao.u-strasbg.fr[130.79.
74.63]
Dec 12 11:42:09 erm1 postfix/smtpd[706]: 405AF5F05: client=macao.u-strasbg.fr[13
0.79.74.63]
Dec 12 11:42:09 erm1 postfix/smtpd[706]: reject: RCPT from macao.u-strasbg.fr[13
0.79.74.63]: 554 <nadine.guillemot@cime.inpg.fr>: Recipient address rejected: Re
lay access denied; from=<herve@erm1.u-strasbg.fr> to=<nadine.guillemot@cime.inpg
.fr>
Dec 12 11:42:14 erm1 postfix/smtpd[706]: disconnect from macao.u-strasbg.fr[130.
79.74.63]

 looked into postfix FAQ and found i had to validate some stuff... so i
 added :
 in main.cf
 smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
          permit_mynetworks
        check_client_access hash:/etc/postfix/client_access
        check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/sender_access
        check_relay_domains

this failed since it expected to find some .db files.... now remembering
the old sendmail days i tryed a 
makemap hash /etc/postfix/client_access.db </etc/postfix/client_access

just to notice, that the makemap command isn't there anymore.....

looking at what postfix supports i found a line with regexp so can i set
up a file with some regexp?
i simply want to allow all computers between 130.79.74.60-99 to be able
to use the server as relay.....

any ideas?


-- 
ciao bboett
==============================================================
bboett@earthling.net
http://inforezo.u-strasbg.fr/~bboett http://erm1.u-strasbg.fr/~bboett
===============================================================
the total amount of intelligence on earth is constant.
human population is growing....



Reply to: