Re: libc6 -- down to potato?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libc6 -- down to potato?
From: Moritz Schulte <tux@gmx.li>
Date: 14 Oct 2000 15:35:20 +0200
Message-id: <8766mvzgtj.fsf@gryffindor.sc>
In-reply-to: Andre Berger's message of "14 Oct 2000 11:04:15 +0200"
References: <87hf6fbxps.fsf@mir.germanistik.uni-bonn.de>

Andre Berger <uzscd5@uni-bonn.de> writes:

> I made a mistake when I upgraded my xemacs21-nomule from the woody
> packages -- libc6 was replaced on my potato box. Am I damned to use
> woody forever? Seriously, I want the stable version!

Is the system usable? Why not kicking out woody-entrys in sources.list
and manually replacing the woody packages with the ones from potato?

	moritz
-- 
/* Moritz Schulte <moritz@hp9001.fh-bielefeld.de>
 * http://hp9001.fh-bielefeld.de/~moritz/
 * PGP-Key available, encrypted Mail is welcome.
 */

Reply to:

References:
- libc6 -- down to potato?
  - From: Andre Berger <uzscd5@uni-bonn.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Potato -newcomerI
Next by Date: Re: OT: WD-40
Previous by thread: libc6 -- down to potato?
Next by thread: RE: libc6 -- down to potato?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread