Re: Woody stability.
Danut A Maces <maces@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> I am runing potato but I would really like to try woody. How stable
>is woody these days?
woody's now the 'testing' distribution, a halfway house; I believe it's
pretty stable, since care is taken to keep it free of the particularly
nasty bugs.
sid, a.k.a. unstable, is not too bad at the moment, as it happens. There
are still some dependency troubles (tetex being the most annoying), but
the system itself runs well. And XFree86 4 is *nice*.
--
Colin Watson [cjw44@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: