Re: latest woody kills dexter?
you need to reconfigure the package, I am not sure which one, probably
xserver-xfree86, and I am not sure how exactly but check the docs for
apt-get and dpkg, you need to run one of them using --config or
something like that.
I think it should create XF86Config-4 by default, at least dexter did.
erik
"Robert L. Harris" wrote:
>
> I did. That complains that XF86Config exists. I remove it, and run
> "dexconf". Taht runs for 2 seconds then creates a file that reads from
> teh "debconf database", no user input. That's the problem. I put a
> bad value inthe deb conf database and need to reconfigure.
>
> Robert
>
> Thus spake Erik Steffl (steffl@bigfoot.com):
>
> > there was another post today saying it was replaced by something,
> > dexconf? or something like that, seach the archives (it was posted today
> > ot yesterday)
> >
> > erik
> >
> > "Robert L. Harris" wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to reconfigure X on my laptop as I put in a bad value durring
> > > last upgrade. I go to run "dexter" and it can't find it. I do a
> > > "dpkg -L xserver-common" and it doesn't show dexter in there anymore.
> > > Has it been moved? I checked the packages list on debian.org and
> > > it still shows it in xserver-common.
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
> > > :wq!
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Robert L. Harris | Micros~1 :
> > > Senior System Engineer | For when quality, reliability
> > > at RnD Consulting | and security just aren't
> > > \_ that important!
> > > DISCLAIMER:
> > > These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
> > > FYI:
> > > perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
> > >
> > > --
> > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
> :wq!
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Robert L. Harris | Micros~1 :
> Senior System Engineer | For when quality, reliability
> at RnD Consulting | and security just aren't
> \_ that important!
> DISCLAIMER:
> These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
> FYI:
> perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
Reply to: