Re: New Installation + Kernel
Only use kernel 2.4 on test systems which you can afford to have go down
if something goes wrong. The current 2.4 versions have the "pre" on their
names explicitly because of their beta nature -- Things might work, but
there's no guarentee.
On a production system which must "just work", 2.2.17 is a better choice
of kernel.
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hanno Böttcher [hannoboettcher@informatik.med.uni-giessen.de] wrote:
> > Hi all!
> >
> > I want to install a Debian and I'm asking myself what Kernel whould be
> > the best choice? E.g. anyone tried the 2.4 ? Is it making Problems?
>
> I am using 2.4.0-test9 and it seems fine so far. It allows me to use
> LVM and ReiserFS, both of which are great!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mark.
>
> --
> _/~~~~~~~~\___/~~~~~~\____________________________________________________
> ____/~~\_____/~~\__/~~\__________________________Mark_Phillips____________
> ____/~~\_____/~~\________________________________mark@ist.flinders.edu.au_
> ____/~~\HE___/~~\__/~~\APTAIN_____________________________________________
> ____/~~\______/~~~~~~\____________________________________________________
> __________________________________________________________________________
> "They told me I was gullible ... and I believed them!"
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
>
Reply to: