[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: rlogin and rsh for potato?



Hello,

On the remote machine, you have to put an entry in the /etc/hosts.equiv file containing the name of your machine (locale !) and your user name. Then you should be able to use rlogin and rsh. There is an rsh client and server package in potato, although ssh is prefered.

Greetings,

Stefan Goeman


On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:12:38AM -0700, Tom Kuiper wrote:
> I just installed potato (2.2) on a new server and tried unsuccessfully to set
> up a daily rdist to it from an old machine running bo (2.0).  After rdist
> failed, I discovered that rsh, which rdist uses by default, (and rlogin) are
> seriously disabled under potato.  I guess it's a security feature. Not only are
> the services disabled in /etc/inetd.conf but the executables /usr/sbin/in.rsh
> and /usr/bin/in.rlogin don't exist. A search of the available packages with
> dselect did not turn up anything I could recognize.
> 
> One option would be to run rdist with ssh, but I also can't find an ssh in the
> bo archive. For that matter, does potato support rsh?
> 
> Any advice would be much appreciated.
> 
> Tom Kuiper
> --
> Internet:       kuiper@DSNra.JPL.NASA.gov (137.79.89.31)
> SnailMail:      Jet Propulsion Lab 169-506, Pasadena, CA 91109
> Phone/fax:      (818) 354-5623/8895
> WWW:            http://DSNra.JPL.NASA.gov/~kuiper/
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null

-- 
********************************************************
*                 SIEMENS ATEA NV                      *
*                                                      *
*  ICN D NC A:                                         *
*    Ir. Stefan Goeman                                 *
*    Tel: +32 14 253020                                *
*    e-mail: Stefan.Goeman@siemens.atea.be             *
*                                                      *
*  P.S.: Linux is great!!                              *
********************************************************
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Reply to: