[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Does my potato need an upgrade?



Dwight,

apt-get update ; apt-get upgrade

My /etc/apt/sources.list is attached. Note particularly the pointer to
security.debian.org.

On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 12:06, Dwight Johnson wrote:
> I have my 2.2 box installed from CDs and all applications are working. Now
> do I need to update packages for security and bug fixes that have been
> released since the CDs were burned off the Internet like I always have to
> with Red Hat? If so, what is the precise apt-get or other command option I
> would use for that? For the moment, I want to stay with packages that are
> stable. This is not a request to 'upgrade to woody'.

Luck,
Pann
-- 
geek by nature, Linux by choice                     L I N U X       .~.
                                                    The Choice      /V\
http://www.ourmanpann.com/linux/                     of a GNU      /( )\
                                                    Generation     ^^-^^
# See sources.list(5) for more information, especialy
# Remember that you can only use http, ftp or file URIs
# CDROMs are managed through the apt-cdrom tool.

# $Id: sources.list,v 1.2 2000/09/26 03:28:06 root Exp root $

#deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
#deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable/non-US main contrib non-free
#deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free

# Uncomment if you want the apt-get source function to work
#deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian stable main contrib non-free
#deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US

deb http://debian.midco.net/debian/ potato main non-free contrib
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org potato/updates main contrib non-free

#deb-src http://debian.midco.net/debian/ potato main non-free contrib
#deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main contrib non-free

Reply to: