RE: Telnet to mail host replies connection refused
Martin,
Thanks for the help! I didn't see the e-mail yet. I will eventually go to
storm-hail because I want to upgrade to potato and have been impressed with
storm-rain (slink) used on another system. I am grateful to have this
resolved.
I have uninstalled a few packages to increase the free disk space. This
resolved the problem. Is there an easy way to tell what files are taking up
the space?
Paul
--
Paul McHale
Work: 937-320-5495 Double E Solutions
Mobile: 937-371-2828 1435 Edenwood Dr
Fax: 413-215-3232 Beavercreek, Ohio 45434
--
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Bialasinski [mailto:martin@internet-treff.uni-koeln.de]
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 3:04 PM
> To: Paul McHale
> Cc: Debian-User
> Subject: Re: Telnet to mail host replies connection refused
>
>
> * "Paul" == Paul McHale <pmchale@doubleesolutions.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Paul> This is what it was set to. I changed it to try the suggestion.
> Paul> Unfortunately, it did not improve. I think I might just
> upgrade to potato.
> Paul> I know this is not the best cure, but I am interested in
> testing the new
> Paul> storm release anyway.
>
> No, this is indeed not the best way.
>
> You got the correct answer already, what's wrong with it?
>
> ====
> From: brian moore <bem@cmc.net>
> Subject: Re: Telnet to mail host replies connection refused
> To: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 23:06:57 -0700
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:39:20PM -0400, Paul McHale wrote:
>
> > Sendmail: Rejecting connection on port 25 : min free: 100
>
> You're low on disk space on /var -- sendmail will refuse to accept mail
> until it has a place to put it.
> ====
>
> You check your diskspace with "df". sendmail wants at least 100
> (kB). Note that anything above 95% diskspace used is only available to
> root.
>
> Maybe your apt cache is quite big. apt-cache clean will remove the
> files.
>
> Ciao,
> Martin
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe
> debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
>
Reply to: