Re: Linux Mail Client
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Steve Lamb wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Thursday, August 24, 2000, 12:19:06 PM, Will wrote:
> > maybe this is the snag you're caught on:
>
> Nope, it isn't where I am getting caught on.
>
> > in the unix paradigm (which linux inhereted/cloned) the idea is to
> > make modules that serve a certain task, and string those modules
> > together to Do What You Want.
>
> Right. However in certain cases that paradigm breaks down. This is one
> of those cases.
>
> > which somecommand
> > less `!!`
>
> Feh. less `which somecommand`. Of course there are problems with find .
> - -atime +30 rm \{\} \; but we won't go into that other than to say it is
> another fine example of why that paradigm breaks down at some point.
>
> > that's what fetchmail/exim/mutt do -- each plays a part in getting,
> > distributing and viewing the email.
>
> Which, as I have pointed out, is broken in certain circumstances.
>
> > since to use a mail client/mua, you hafta be logged in (i.e. have
> > an account, may as well yank all your remote accounts (fetchmail) and
> > plop them into your verious mail folders (exim/procmail) and read each
> > group in its own isolated environment (mutt) so you can wear the
> > appropriate hat for the appropriate subject at hand.
>
> First off, procmail is redundant. I love people who talk about exim and
> procmail in the same breath as if procmail is needed. Second procmail and
> mutt do not offered its own isomated environment. If you had read this
> thread, you would by now understand that. As I said, it breaks down after a
> certain point.
>
> > modularity, the clarion call of unix... we see it as A Good Thing.
>
> Yes, it is a good thing. Breaking down too far is a bad thing. It is
> finding that medium breakpoint that is the problem, isn't it?
>
>
> - --
> Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
> ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
> - -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.5i
>
> iQA/AwUBOaV5G3pf7K2LbpnFEQI3dACfc0iBa5KBK9GiBFFfw7SAxhmdVCkAmgJI
> 4kZFI1CJSq9Q4WD2xIRIzfQR
> =DfjH
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
Don't you guys think you have beaten this thing into the ground. Enough
already. Give it a rest. I don't think you are ever going to get through to
Mr. Lamb. If you are that unhappy about mail on UNIX/Linux do something
about it otherwise give my inbox a rest, eh.
Dan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel E. Baumann E-mail: baumannd@msoe.edu (preferred)
baumannd@trio.msoe.edu baumannd@penguinpowered.com (caution: dynamic
DNS service, may bounce)
Web location: http://www.msoe.edu/~baumannd
http://www.linuxfreak.com/~baumannd
"Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code."
-- Dave Olson
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daniel E. Baumann
E-mail: baumannd@msoe.edu (preferred)
baumannd@trio.msoe.edu
baumannd@penguinpowered.com (caution: dynamic DNS service, may bounce)
Web location: http://www.msoe.edu/~baumannd
http://www.linuxfreak.com/~baumannd
"Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code."
-- Dave Olson
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: