Yep, it works if you treat it like 98... Thanks for the info! Got it working first shot after I got a couple of responses that it doesn't do anything strange with the boot... On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 05:16:42PM -0400, Simon Law wrote: > It's more like NT, but it matters not. You can still use LILO to boot, if > you're more comfortable with that. Otherwise, do that NT bootloader thing, > but that requires you to copy over the bootsector to your NT drive everytime > you upgrade your kernel. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nate Duehr [mailto:nate@telluride.natetech.com]On Behalf Of Nate > Duehr > Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2000 2:29 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Dual-Boot Win2K & Debian > > > Hi all, > > An unfortunate requirement for a particular piece of software from my > workplace and the desire to play a few games is forcing me to put Win2K > on my desktop machine here at home, which used to be a "Windows Free > Zone"... > > The question I have is, how to properly dual-boot Win2K and Linux? Does > 2K act more like 95/98 which is easy to dual-boot from LILO, or is it > more like NT in which you edited the boot.ini file and could boot Linux > from the NT bootloader easier than messing with LILO? > > Anyone doing this? I did a quick Google search and didn't find much of > value on the topic... yet. > > Thanks, > > -- > Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com> > > GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2 > Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others. > -- Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com> GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2 Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
Attachment:
pgpxqO7GmERji.pgp
Description: PGP signature